Topic: 학교에서 8~13세의 학우에게 사교육을 제한하는것에 대해 어떻게 생각하는가?
357자
An ongoing debate exists over whether the extracurricular constraint policy is good for students or not. I firmly feel that extracurriculars would be beneficial rather than another choice. Because extracurriculars can fill their empty part of knowledge. And they can learn the kind of activities which students want.
First of all, extracurriculars can fill the empty part of knowledge. Specifically, sometimes some of the students are difficult school education, there are two types of problems, the first thing is students don’t have enough capabilities to learn. Moreover, having problems with the educator’s teaching. However, extracurriculars can resolve these problems by learning more information from professional instructors. If they don’t take part in these activities, they could be gapped with the other students. For example, when I was young, I could do well in all of the subjects except mathematics. This is why to resolve this problem I enrolled math academic course. therefore the professional educator can teach me how to do mathematics well. After finishing the course, I could get a high score than I expected.
Secondly, students can learn the kind of activities which they want. To explain, School doesn’t offer entire activities such as DJ, Asian chess, acting, and smart art. Thereby they can not satisfy all parts of the sections. Therefore students have to register extra-class to acquire kind of factors. Absolutely If they don’t enroll in the extra class, they never could acquire some skills or what they wanted. For instance, one of my friends wanted to be a singer. But most schools didn’t teach them how to be good singers or manage their voices. Accordingly, he thought that he had to visit an academic course. And he did it as his plan. after finishing the course, he could his level of music. Now he is active as a singer.
To sum up, everyone may hold a different view on this issue. However, I absolutely support the perspective that extracurriculars would be beneficial rather than another choice. The rationale behind this is as follows. extracurriculars can fill their empty part of knowledge. And they can learn the kind of activities which students want.
gpt
First of all, extracurriculars can fill the empty part of knowledge. Specifically, sometimes some students struggle with their school education, and there are two types of problems. The first problem is that students don't have enough capabilities to learn, and the second problem is related to difficulties with the educators' teaching. However, extracurriculars can resolve these problems by providing an opportunity to learn from professional instructors. If students don't take part in these activities, they may fall behind compared to their peers. For example, when I was young, I excelled in all subjects except mathematics. To address this issue, I enrolled in a math academic course, where a professional educator taught me how to excel in mathematics. After completing the course, I achieved a higher score than I had initially anticipated.
Secondly, students can learn the kind of activities they want. To explain, schools don't offer a wide range of activities such as DJing, Asian chess, acting, and smart art. As a result, students cannot satisfy all their diverse interests and passions. Therefore, students have to enroll in extracurricular classes to develop specific skills or pursue their interests. If they don't participate in these classes, they will miss out on acquiring certain skills or pursuing what they desire. For instance, one of my friends aspired to become a singer, but most schools didn't provide instruction on how to improve singing or manage one's voice. Consequently, he felt the need to join a specialized music program or course. After completing the course, he was able to improve his musical skills. Now he is actively pursuing a career as a singer.